Jennifer Aniston left bruised after sex
Jennifer Aniston talking about her new movie ‘Derailed’ reveled that filming passionate sex scenes with hunky co-star Clive Owen left her bruised.
“I got good bruises on my legs - not pretty. But your adrenaline is running so you don’t even feel it,” the actress said.
The former ‘Friends’ star, who recently divorced husband Brad Pitt, has also admitted she felt awkward filming the raunchy scenes, because she had only known Clive for a couple of weeks. The stunning actress said, “It’s Week 2: ‘How are you, nice to meet you,’ and let’s get to the sex.”
In ‘Derailed’ Aniston plays a married woman, called Lucinda Harris, who has a tryst with Owen’s character Charles Schine.
The actress recently revealed she took the role after her pal Julia Roberts, who starred opposite Clive in ‘Closer’, told her the actor was “dreamy” to work with. And Jennifer says she wasn’t disappointed, saying, “Was he dreamy? Yes, absolutely. And then some.”
More: Hollywood News
Related Posts
Jennifer Aniston no more, sorry for herself
Jennifer Aniston has vowed never again to talk about her...
Intruder arrested for braking into Jennifer Aniston home
Jennifer Aniston was left terrified after a man broke into...
Vaughn not dating Aniston
Actor Vince Vaughn says he is not dating Jennifer Aniston....
none
{AP)Associated Press
Updated: 5:39 p.m. ET Dec. 6, 2005
LOS ANGELES - Jennifer Aniston is suing a paparazzo, claiming he invaded her privacy by using a telephoto lens to photograph her topless at her house.
My previous comments said it best. Like church we go for peace of mind. Our homes is our private domain. What if a Actors child or Teenager is moving about indecently about the property of a private home do a camera pervert have a right to be snapping pictures? How many perverted pictures do some sick bastards have in their possession. Sticking cameras with telephoto lens snapping pictures through someone bedroom window or beach house while they are disrobing is sick. This is just to sell porn on the open market mainly overseas. A paparazzi and the agency they represent should be sued and lawfully charged. A candid celebrity photo is worth more to the public (on public domain), than the sickening gut feeling most people get when they find out the picture was snap by a paparazzi or a sick sucker through the window of a private home.
Comment by Pedro Dixon — 12/9/2005 @ 10:54 am